HTML/Javascript

Be a VoiceThis year the National Environmental Health Association (NEHA) has added a new way to participate in the Call for Abstracts process for the Annual Educational Conference (AEC) & Exhibition. It is called, "Be a voice" and it gives you the opportunity to tell us what you'd like to experience at the AEC. Tell us topics you'd like to hear about and speakers you'd like to see. Review abstracts and provide input. Help NEHA develop a training and education experience that continues to advance the proficiency of the environmental health profession AND helps create bottom line improvements for your organization!
To search for specific abstracts, please use the search box located at the top left of the page (*next to the Blogger icon). Search Help

HELPFUL LINKS:     How to Participate and Use this Blog  |   Disclosure   |   NEHA Blog Policy and Participation Guide

ADDITIONAL WAYS TO PARTICIPATE:    Suggest a Topic  |   Suggest a Speaker  |   Questions?


Wednesday, October 24, 2012

A Simple Tool to More Objectively Evaluate Housekeeping\Cleaning Activities for Health, Safety and Aesthetics in Community Institutions

image: www.mint.com
Housekeeping in institutions, whether they be day care centers, university dorms, nursing home rooms, hospital rooms, or jail and prison housing, rely on in-house labor and simplified methodologies to minimize health and safety risks; while providing some level of aesthetic cleanliness is most desirable. Epidemiological studies have detailed minor disease outbreaks in correctional facilities linked to common-touch and chronically wet surfaces such as showers and toilet areas. In addition, analysis of injury and incident reports involving trips, slips and falls within hospitals and correctional settings focus on housekeeping methods and outcomes, and to a lesser degree, maintenance.

In a recent court case involving plaintiffs, defendants and court-appointed monitors (all Registered Sanitarians), the evaluation of housekeeping activities by all parties was widely disparate; with less than 50% agreement because of subjectivity and personal bias precluding objective outcomes. The parties conducting the inspections initially agreed to use a simplified sampling strategy adapted from MIL-STD-105E (ANSI/ASQ Z1.4) and develop a matrix of ten readily-observable cleaning and cleaning-related parameters as an inspection tool. The matrix parameters were constructed to easily conform to a Boolean logic (it was clean or it was not clean)(+/-); definitions and inspection methodologies were precisely detailed and acceptable quality levels (AQL) established for each separate facility inspected.

The outcomes demonstrated both the precise strengths and weaknesses in the overall housekeeping programs. In turn, these were used for quality improvement and ultimately, for quality assurance such as modifying the institution’s existing Standard Sanitation Operating Procedures (SSOP). The inspection matrix was designed so that all inspectors would be within a ≥80 percentile agreement. The methodology for this exercise can be adapted to any institutional program where environmental health and safety parameters are evaluated.

No comments:

Post a Comment